Pouvoirs, revue française d'études constitutionnelle et politiques

Index des auteurs

Tous les numéros de Pouvoirs
Cliquez dans la liste pour accéder à un numéro.
Archives intégralement gratuites au-delà de 3 ans

La newsletter

version_mobile_du_site
Version mobile
groupe_facebook
Groupe Facebook
flux_rss
Flux RSS
alter_éco
Numéros papiers
lienSeuil
lienCairn
Version imprimable de cet article Version imprimable

Post Mortem. Reason and Folly in the Debate over the Deprivation of Nationality

The extension of the deprivation of nationality to bi-nationals condemned for terrorist crimes has ignited a heated public debate. It was proposed by the President in front of the Congress, three days after the November 13th 2015 terrorist attacks, and was abandoned on March 30th 2016, because of the impossibility to carry out the necessary revision of the Constitution. Together with the analysis of the key moments of this debate, some useful lessons can be drawn regarding the autonomy of the political sphere, the risks of acting in times of emergency, the complexity of the shaping of public opinion, and the dangers of the debate over the deprivation of nationality.

français

Ajouter au panier

Référence électonique : Gilles FINCHELSTEIN, "Post Mortem. Reason and Folly in the Debate over the Deprivation of Nationality", Pouvoirs, revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, n°160, 160 - La Nationalité, p.99-112 . Consulté le 2020-01-20 16:05:26 . URL : https://revue-pouvoirs.fr/Post-Mortem-Reason-and-Folly-in.html