Pouvoirs, revue française d'études constitutionnelle et politiques

Index des auteurs

Tous les numéros de Pouvoirs
Cliquez dans la liste pour accéder à un numéro.
Archives intégralement gratuites au-delà de 3 ans

La newsletter

version_mobile_du_site
Version mobile
groupe_facebook
Groupe Facebook
flux_rss
Flux RSS
alter_éco
Numéros papiers
lienSeuil
lienCairn
Version imprimable de cet article Version imprimable

Conflicts of Verdicts Between Judges

A widely-shared idea claims that European Courts are not the judges
of French law. A critical examination indicates that, from a strictly
legal point of view, this is not so, and that a stiff competition opposes,
at least potentially, the various classes of French and European judges
on this point. In addition, French law does not seem to offer the necessary
resources to solve such conflicts of verdicts. For this reason and
also in view of the political, theoretical and symbolic stakes involved in
these conflicts, the author argues against letting the judges themselves
find a solution, and therefore in favor of a repolitisation of the debate
concerning this issue.

français

Référence électonique : Denys DE BÉCHILLON, "Conflicts of Verdicts Between Judges", Pouvoirs, revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, n°96, 96 - Les cours européennes. Luxembourg et Strasbourg, p.107-122 . Consulté le 2020-01-19 22:55:46 . URL : https://revue-pouvoirs.fr/Conflicts-of-Verdicts-Between.html