Pouvoirs, revue française d'études constitutionnelle et politiques

Index des auteurs

Tous les numéros de Pouvoirs
Cliquez dans la liste pour accéder à un numéro.
Archives intégralement gratuites au-delà de 3 ans

La newsletter

version_mobile_du_site
Version mobile
groupe_facebook
Groupe Facebook
flux_rss
Flux RSS
alter_éco
Numéros papiers
lienSeuil
lienCairn
Version imprimable de cet article Version imprimable

Michel TROPER

Jurisdictionnal fonction or Judicial Power ?

Pouvoirs n°16 - La justice - janvier 1981 - p.5-15

The question of the alleged existence of a third Power, beside the Legislative and the Executive, the Judiciary, that gave rise to sharp clashes at the end of the 19th century, must be reexamined, but solely from a descriptive, rather than a normative point of view. As a matter of fact, the function exercised by judges is undoubtedly of a political character, for it implies the power to give an authentic interpretation of statutes, i.e. a discretionnary power. Nevertheless, if that function is political, its possession does not give the owner the status of a third Power. First because, unlike the Legislative or the Executive, judges do not constitue a single authority. Secondly, because the structure of judicial motivation prevents judges from expressing and translating their political preferences into the form of judicial decisions.

français

Référence électonique : Michel TROPER, "Jurisdictionnal fonction or Judicial Power ?", Pouvoirs, revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, n°16, 16 - La justice, p.5-15. Consulté le 2017-09-22 06:40:16 . URL : http://revue-pouvoirs.fr/Jurisdictionnal-fonction-or.html